Yesterday I was also updating my mom's portfolio and adding to info in it to my spreadsheet so I could check the up and downs versus the S&P. I haven't even looked at this portfolio for two months and didn't know that it was 25% cash until I logged in.
So I bought WU, and two special situations I am currently favoring. Now she is 10% cash and I will go back to patiently waiting for good opportunities.
Good opportunities is basically what I do with her portfolio and my sister's. Some of the good opportunities we have bought are Pfizer at $20, Altria at $49.55, MSO at $11 after Martha Stewart went to jail and selling at $22 a year later, both Tilson mutual funds at inception in April 2005, since then they are both up between 25 and 30%
So I was looking at her portfolio returns - 31% since June 2004 compared with 21.2% from the S&P - and couldn't figure out why she was up 28% more than me even though her biggest position is AVEMX and I spend about 2,000% more time 'managing' my portfolio by researching ideas trading in and out of Going Private Transactions and other Special Situations, until it hit me.
Her portfolio has soundly beat the S&P because I don't 'manage' it. It's such a pain to convince her to allow me to log-in to her account to look at what she owns and jump through the hoops to be able to buy companies they have to be obvious buys for them to be purchased.
This is where I go wrong in my portfolio; JRCC was not an 'obvious buy' I read articles from smart investors saying the coal market was in an up cycle and JRCC was the most undervalued of all the coal companies. What the articles didn't say is JRCC had crappy management and the coal market was about to fall fast. Since I didn't know enough about the company or the coal market to convince my mom to buy it I didn't even bother explaining it I just bought it in the accounts I manage where I don't need permission to buy things.
This has happened over and over with my portfolio, more so with the money I manage for my Grandpa. His portfolio is truly excruciatingly painful for me to look at every day and I dread the phone calls where I have to explain what's wrong with it.
I did get lucky with a few stocks in his portfolio, DTV is up 57% since I bought it, LKI is up 15% and was up 25% when I trimmed it by half, OSTK is up 10% so far and I have made about 20% on the portfolio with different special situations since I started managing it.
Even with all of this the portfolio is down 14% since inception compared with a 16% gain by the S&P, this is 30 percentage points of difference - unacceptable.
Before this year I barely did any research for stocks I bought in this portfolio, it was barely any of my Grandpa's net worth so there was no reason for me to worry about it falling.
But it was down about 10% going into this year and my grandparents were getting antsy so I promised to start treating this portfolio as I did the others.
This translates to better, positive, returns. Or so I thought.
After buying ACUS late last year because of a series of posts on the Motley Fool Message Boards and next to no additional research on my part ACUS is down 42%. I also played with fire, or should we say coal, in this portfolio to the tune of a current 35% loss in ICO and a 50% loss on the selling of JRCC.
So here's my solution to all this, and hopefully this will put the returns of my portfolio 33% higher then the S&P over the next few years: I will keep the current 50% of my mom's portfolio in mutual funds, but with the other 50% I will duplicate my portfolio - this means before I buy anything in any portfolio my mom needs to understand the reasoning and be OK with the buy.
Book Update
I have been too busy to read anywhere but school so I am currently a few chapters from the end of Moneyball










